To: Condor51
This sexism charge is beyond stoo-pid, is utter nonsense and insulting. The whole defense of Miers is beyond stupid and insulting. This whole debate is so intellectually dishonest. It is not about elitism or about sexism or about any other kind of bigotry. It is all about if Miers will rule like a conservative and in her 60 year carreer, Harriet Miers has given no indication that she would. Harriet has every appearance of being a moderate, albiet a conservative leaning moderate. Real conservatives have real reasons to be disappointed, and until the defenders can acknowledge that honestly they will get nowhere.
To: Always Right
It is all about if Miers will rule like a conservative...
No, it's not. It's about whether Miers will rule as an originalist, not a conservative. Yes, there is a difference between the two: a conservative would jump at the first chance a case presented to ban abortion, while an originalist would refer said issue to the states.
38 posted on
10/11/2005 6:36:59 AM PDT by
Terpfen
(Bush is playing chess. Remember that, and stop playing checkers.)
To: Always Right
How could one determine that such a thing is not possible, what evidence would you use? Of course it is possible, but because a thing is possible does not mean it is likely. The question is frivolous.
To: Always Right
It is not about elitism or about sexism or about any other kind of bigotry. It is all about if Miers will rule like a conservative and in her 60 year carreer, Harriet Miers has given no indication that she would.*************
Not for me. For me it's all about whether or not she's an originalist. There should be no political agenda on the court. It's all about the US constitution. Period.
368 posted on
10/11/2005 2:40:45 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson