To: Cautor
The worst of it is, by putting up stealth nominees the Pubs pass over qualified candidates who stood and defended their beliefs when it was not popular to do so. The pubs reward "corporate gadfly's" with no track records or ability to fight for a belief.
The Rats always nominate the most opinionated, biased judges who will fight for their beliefs they can find and then we are surprised that are meek stealth nominees are turned into liberals on the SCOTUS.
50 posted on
10/10/2005 6:18:32 PM PDT by
wmfights
(lead, follow, or get out of the way)
To: wmfights
"The Rats always nominate the most opinionated, biased judges who will fight for their beliefs they can find and then we are surprised that are meek stealth nominees are turned into liberals on the SCOTUS."
The put up Ruth Bader-Ginsberg a top ACLU mouthpiece. They sure knew where she stood on issues important to the Democrap base. We like to self-flagilate.
56 posted on
10/10/2005 6:20:39 PM PDT by
Cautor
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson