To: Hendrix
Well, okay, but I don't think the only thing we have to worry about are her basic beliefs (conservative vs. liberal), but how strong and unflappable (vs. apathetic and squooshy) she is in them.
To: marsh_of_mists
"Well, okay, but I don't think the only thing we have to worry about are her basic beliefs (conservative vs. liberal), but how strong and unflappable (vs. apathetic and squooshy) she is in them."
I agree, and I have found that people without strong beliefs (the kind that don't care about politics or religion) tend to be swayed easily. Like the old saying, if you don't stand for anything, then you will fall for anything (something like that).
30 posted on
10/10/2005 3:21:08 PM PDT by
Hendrix
To: marsh_of_mists
Well, okay, but I don't think the only thing we have to worry about are her basic beliefs (conservative vs. liberal), but how strong and unflappable (vs. apathetic and squooshy) she is in them.So those with judicial track records...Souter, Kennedy, and O'Connor all swung left. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. I would nominate a CROSSING GUARD if I thought she would break that trend. Give Miers her chance...
31 posted on
10/10/2005 3:22:46 PM PDT by
ez
(W. quells 2 consecutive filibusters and gets 2 religious people on the court. Bravo!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson