Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quidnunc
Yes I want Hillary to nominate people to high office for eight years, if this is my alternative. She's a wicked person and a dyed in the wool liberal. But the people she will nominate will be able to read and write.

If you aren't for merit then I'm not for you. It is that simple. If merit won't be defended in the Republican party, then to hell with the Republican party. Are we clear yet?

135 posted on 10/10/2005 10:04:18 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JasonC
JasonC wrote: Yes I want Hillary to nominate people to high office for eight years, if this is my alternative. She's a wicked person and a dyed in the wool liberal. But the people she will nominate will be able to read and write. If you aren't for merit then I'm not for you. It is that simple. If merit won't be defended in the Republican party, then to hell with the Republican party. Are we clear yet?

It's clear you're blathering.

136 posted on 10/10/2005 10:11:35 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

To: JasonC
Do you know who is considered by almost all to be the greatest justice to ever serve on SCOTUS? Did you realize this person had only briefly studied law? Did you know he did not have any judicial experience when he was appointed chief justice, and yet he is considered the person who had the most influence on Constitutional Law? Have you ever heard of John Marshall? His single greatest attribute, which has been lacking in many of the recent justices to SCOTUS was character.

John Marshall-Biography

Experience: No prior judicial experience. Marshall held many political offices at the state and national levels.

John Marshall was born in a log cabin on the Virginia frontier, the first of fifteen children. He was a participant in the Revolutionary War as a member of the 3d Virginia Regiment. He studied law briefly in 1780, and was admitted to practice the same year. He quickly established a successful career defending individuals against their pre-War British creditors.

Marshall served in Virginia's House of Delegates. He also participated in the state ratifying convention and spoke forcefully on behalf of the new constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation.

Marshall contemplated several offers to serve in the Washington and Adams administrations. He declined service as attorney general for Washington; he declined positions on the Supreme Court and as secretary of war under Adams. At Washington's direction, Marshall ran successfully for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives but his tenure there was brief. Adams offered Marshall the position of secretary of state, which Marshall accepted. When Ellsworth resigned as chief justice in 1800, Adams turned to the first chief justice, John Jay, who declined. Federalists urged Adams to promote associate justice William Paterson to the spot; Adams opted for Marshall.

Marshall's impact on American constitutional law is peerless. He served for more than 34 years (a record that few others have broken), he participated in more than 1000 decisions and authored over 500 opinions. As the single most important figure on constitutional law, Marshall's imprint can still be fathomed in the great issues of contemporary America. Other justices will surpass his single accomplishments, but no one will replace him as the Babe Ruth of the Supreme Court!

http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/legal_entity/13/overview

142 posted on 10/11/2005 6:00:08 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson