Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
A recess appointment simply means Bush will have to renominate Bolton in 2007 and go through the process again.

But it IS the President jamming something down the Senate's throat. And in 2007, with a track record, the confirmation process is different.

Why is the President willing to risk recess appointment for UN ambassador, but not SCOTUS?

61 posted on 10/10/2005 9:33:03 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
It's unfair to ask someone to give a year of their lives to the SC, then risk not being confirmed.

The older judge Pickering bowed out rather than go through a recess appointment for that very reason.

62 posted on 10/10/2005 9:35:43 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson