[madprof98]

Seems you can't exploit children when these children don't exist to be exploited in the first place.

Seemed so to the judges on the Supreme Court. Interestingly, Clarence Thomas joined the lib-activists on this one, while Rehnquist and Scalia dissented. I suspect personal fondness for porn outweighed conservatism there, as it seems to on this forum as well.

[Sam's Army]

"I suspect personal fondness for porn outweighed conservatism there, as it seems to on this forum as well."

Well, don't you know Jefferson and Madison had this in mind when telling the King to take a hike? I mean what would we do without our right to see girls vomit on screen?

Will the last conservative out please turn off the lights?

[ThinkDifferent]

I suspect personal fondness for porn outweighed conservatism there, as it seems to on this forum as well.

Right, and anyone who opposes the WOD is a pothead, and anyone who opposes hate crime laws is a racist. Take your ad hominems to DU.

[jmc813]

Interestingly, Clarence Thomas joined the lib-activists on this one, while Rehnquist and Scalia dissented. I suspect personal fondness for porn outweighed conservatism there, as it seems to on this forum as well.

Now you're trashing Clarence Thomas personally? You really need to get laid.