Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TSchmereL
By doing so, he has created a real incentive for judges who aspire to be nominated to higher courts to avoid creating clear conservative records for themselves.

No kidding. What this appointment says is, "NEVER issue a conservative judgment, because it will forever outlaw you from being promoted to a higher court."

So, does this mean that if conservative judges hope to be promoted on the merits of their decisions, they will have to issue nothing but liberal decisions? Apparently.

26 posted on 10/10/2005 1:28:14 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

By nominating a stealth conservative to avoid having the debate, Bush has basically said to outspoken conservatives . . . if you want to be nominated to a high court position, you better cool it.

Bush did not do this intentionally, of course. But it is the implied message: To all conservatives who publicize and debate their views in public, we give you our moral support. But when the rewards are handed out, you will be passed over for others who kept their opinions secret.


70 posted on 10/10/2005 4:24:50 PM PDT by TSchmereL ("Trust but verify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
No kidding. What this appointment says is, "NEVER issue a conservative judgment, because it will forever outlaw you from being promoted to a higher court."

And don't even get a subscription to National Review in your own name. Either buy it on the street or put the subscription in your siblings name.

86 posted on 10/10/2005 6:59:52 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (you call me a right wing extremist like it's a bad thing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson