Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DHS Appropriations Bill Changes Related to RINO Kolbe's anti-Checkpoint Language
10 October 2005 | Spiff

Posted on 10/10/2005 8:52:41 AM PDT by Spiff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
RINO Kolbe is being challenged in the next Republican Primary Election by conservative Randy Graf.

Graf was one of the primary organizers of Proposition 200 in Arizona, served as the Majority Whip in the Arizona House of Representatives, and was a Minuteman Project participant.

You can find out more about Randy Graf and see how you can help him defeat Jim Kolbe by going to his website at www.votegraf.com.

1 posted on 10/10/2005 8:52:46 AM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Further, it demonstrates that it is time for Kolbe to find another career as he no longer represents the people of his district nor is he committed to securing our nation.

KOLBE MUST GO!!!

2 posted on 10/10/2005 9:06:36 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
I'm glad to see that Randy Graf has stepped up to challenge this guy. Perhaps a Minuteman Voters Guide or some similar press release is in order to detail what people like Kolbe are doing and make sure that it gets well publicized during the upcoming primary season.
3 posted on 10/10/2005 9:40:55 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("They're thin and they were riding bicycles" - Ted Turner on NK malnutrition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx; gubamyster; janetgreen; Travis McGee; Stellar Dendrite; backhoe; Itzlzha; devolve; Czar; ...

PING


4 posted on 10/10/2005 9:43:06 AM PDT by Spiff (Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; A CA Guy; ...

ping


5 posted on 10/10/2005 10:03:45 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

Protect our borders and coastlines from all foreign invaders!

Support our Minutemen Patriots!

Be Ever Vigilant ~ Bump!


6 posted on 10/10/2005 10:17:50 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver

bttt


7 posted on 10/10/2005 10:26:14 AM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Maybe you can clear something up?

I've read about this issue in articles posted at FR in the past and recall that it was a permanent check point versus a roaming checkpoint issue. At the time, I did some googling and found out which constituents were opposed to the permanent check points.

Now as I read this article, it seems to imply that Kolbe is against check points of any kind.

Which is it?

8 posted on 10/10/2005 11:15:36 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Kolbe seeks to limit the Border Patrol's arsenal of border security tools. He is specifically against permanent checkpoints on the highways but is also against roaming checkpoints which appear to target the same highways.

This, of course, is a ludicrous position because there are only a handful of highways in Kolbe's district that go from south to north and no other roads that can be taken north. Highways 19, 80, 90, and 191 are the only ways to get north to Interstate 10 in a car. Roaming checkpoints along those 4 highways are pointless and the Border Patrol has pointed that out repeatedly.

If the Border Patrol thought that ONLY using roaming checkpoints was the most effective, that is what they would do.

Now that the GAO has demonstrated that Kolbe's anti-checkpoint language has resulted in a 77% reduction of Border Patrol effectiveness in his district, it is obvious that the checkpoints were necessary and that Kolbe was wrong. Kolbe did not shut down the check points in his district to improve border security and Border Patrol effectiveness as he likes to say, he did so to appease fat cat developers and donors from Tubac and Green Valley.

9 posted on 10/10/2005 11:30:22 AM PDT by Spiff (Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
As anyone who has been thru checkpoints can tell you, the roaming checkpoints are much more effective.

When the checkpoint becomes permanent, everyone knows where it is.

There are plenty of routes to circumvent these check points. For those who don't want to drive sround them, they simply let the illegals out of the vehicle 5 miles south of the checkpoint and pick them up 5 miles north of the checkpoint.

In fact, this was the complaint by residents in an upscale area of AZ close to the permanent checkpoint. The illegals were bypassing thru their area 24/7.

The same problem exists in Texas.

One of the men currently invoved in Texas MM has the same problem. I don't recall his name but he is the Falfurrias vet whose ranch is close-by to the permanent checkpoint and has illegals hoofing it north across his property.

This was the same problem that Rancher Sutton had a few years ago in south Texas. He made the mistake of letting Ranch Rescue on to his property and when RR pistol whipped the illegals, he settled out of court for a 100 grand.

The problem is that the BP union insists on permanent because it is easier on the agents.

10 posted on 10/10/2005 11:55:11 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
You're full of crap. I live on the border, drive the highways, and encounter the checkpoints. I know and am friends with several Border Patrol agents and this is a common topic of discussion. In this sector, as I said before, there are 5 highways going north to I-10. There are no other roads that will get you around the strategically placed permanent checkpoints.

The agents are not confined to the checkpoints as you stupidly surmise. They are watching the behavior of drivers approaching the checkpoints and surveilling the areas where the drivers may drop their loads to attempt to get around the checkpoints. It is easy to spot the drivers trying to get their loads around the checkpoints, ask a Border Patrol agent who has worked one.

It is not the Border Patrol union alone that insists upon checkpoints. It is the Border Patrol from the field agents all the way up to the management. And now the GAO report backs them up on how it reduces effectiveness to remove this critical tool from their arsenal of border security tools.

And if the permanent checkpoints were so ineffective, why aren't they prohibited along the entire border and not just RINO Kolbe's home district?

I don't expect this to change your opinion or that of RINO Jim Kolbe. Neither of you put a priority on securing our border and have some other agenda that does not serve the best interests of our national security in a time of terrorist war. I just want to counter the bullcrap that you posted here.

11 posted on 10/10/2005 12:10:00 PM PDT by Spiff (Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Of course the answer is building better border barriers to stop most of the border intrusions in the first place, but of course OBLs like Ben Flickin will lie and tell you how easy it is to get around those too and that they should never be built. We can't stop everyone so we shouldn't even try seems to be their idiotic philosophy.


12 posted on 10/10/2005 12:14:39 PM PDT by Spiff (Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
The one thing that contradicts you and you cannot dispute is that those who live/own land close to the permanent checkpoints have serious problems with illegals bypassing.

I am aware that the sgents patrol south of the checkpoints, but how many agents does it take to patrol 5-10 miles. And I know that if the landowner allows them they will patrol on the private land in proximity to the checkpoint, but that is a huge area.

The main benefit is that when the coyote/smuggler doesn't know where the checkpoint is going to be tonight, he is on top of it/close to it before he knows its there and much easier caught.

Anybody whose has been thru these checkponts can tell you this. Of course if you are a fundraiser for Graf and trying BS an issue, that is of little importance.

13 posted on 10/10/2005 12:33:59 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Anybody whose has been thru these checkponts can tell you this.

You're not paying attention. I live on the border and regularly go through the checkpoints. I talk to the Border Patrol agents. You are WRONG on this and so many other border-related issues.

14 posted on 10/10/2005 12:40:41 PM PDT by Spiff (Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Your problem is that you think you know more about than anyone else. This is mainly because you are feebleminded and have little common sense.

I'll say it again. You cannot dispute the fact that many, many illegals bypass the permanent checkpoints.

15 posted on 10/10/2005 12:48:19 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Your problem is that you think you know more about than anyone else. This is mainly because you are feebleminded and have little common sense. I'll say it again. You cannot dispute the fact that many, many illegals bypass the permanent checkpoints.

Many illegal attempt to bypass permanent checkpoints. Some make it past them. That does not mean, however, that permanent checkpoints are useless and should not be erected.

You, and your OBL comrades think that because a permanent structure (a wall or checkpoint) may be bypassed by a few, that they should never be erected. We should just give up and throw the borders open despite the damage that would do. Talk about feebleminded lacking common sense...

I may not know more than "anyone else", but I certainly know a great deal more about this subject than you have proven to know. So, what part of Texas do you live in? How close is the border to your home? How often do you have to report criminal invaders to the Border Patrol? How many of your friends and family have been negatively affected by the criminal invaders? How many people do you know who have lost their jobs or businesses to criminal invaders? How many times have you been chased by criminal invaders as they yell, "We're going to kill you, M-----F-----!" How many friends have you had criminal invaders attempt to kill while they're stealing your friend's car to go north? How many times have you stood and watched the border and reported criminal invaders coming across near your home? How many times have you had friends have their property invaded by 50 criminal invaders at a time? You don't know crap about the border, but you certainly don't hesitate to post it.

16 posted on 10/10/2005 12:55:32 PM PDT by Spiff (Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

You even admit in your reply #9 that Kolbe's constituents have a problem with bypassing illegals but you discount it by calling them "fat cat doners"


17 posted on 10/10/2005 1:14:15 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Spiff; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; HiJinx; Czar; dennisw; bitt; Grampa Dave; ...


     
18 posted on 10/10/2005 1:36:41 PM PDT by devolve (--------------- ( -- under deconstruction -- ) ---------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

1.I'm so sorry about the endless horror our government's lack of enforcement has forced on your friends and loved ones. This travesty must not only be corrected, those responsible have to answer for it.

2.You may be so close to the trees that your perspective of the forest may be somewhat limited. The corrupted elements of the Mexican Army bank on the dependability of fixed spots. They use state-of-the-art communications and some of the best tactical strategies out of Ft. Leavenworth (School Of The Americas). The agents in those spots can not know what's flowing around them, especially when their budget and resources are paltry compared to the bad guys. When the BP had flexibility they were actually more effective though far more at risk of danger. Moving back to erratic patrols now would result in bloodshed. Read into that what you will.

3.Kolbe's time of hobbling the Border Patrol for the benefit of his illegal-slaving constituents may be coming to an end, thanks to you and many other outraged Arizonans sick of his crap. Graf is looking really good on his second, wiser shot. That no one has played up Kolbe's "alternative lifestyle" leaves me wondering if Arizonan's are that accepting of it. The pictures I've seen of him "photo-opping" with young citizens respecting him as a senator totally creep me out.


19 posted on 10/10/2005 3:09:23 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (Build up the Wall. Build up the Wall. Build up the wall. Build up the wall. Build up the wall...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin; Spiff
You even admit in your reply #9 that Kolbe's constituents have a problem with bypassing illegals but you discount it by calling them "fat cat doners"

If those are the folks I'm thinking of, they amount to less than 10% of the people involved. Remember, Spiff listed an Interstate and 4 State highways. The 'fat cat donors' live in Green Valley along I-19 unless I'm mistaken.

And as for being able to walk around the checkpoint...I urge you to try it sometime. Really hard to do around these checkpoints. But by all means, give it a shot - if you feel lucky!

20 posted on 10/10/2005 4:33:46 PM PDT by HiJinx (~ Plug the Dike ~ Drain the Swamp ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson