Fascinating and thanks for posting it. However, this paper must be a hoax of some sort. We've been told repeatedly that scientists don't allow any information to be presented that might conflict with existing theory. Is it possible that Feduccia, et el, did not get the memo from Conspiracy HQ?
Yes. That's why I try to post (or ping to) serious articles (not from creationist websites, of course) about factual disagreements, academic misconduct, etc.
We've been told repeatedly that scientists don't allow any information to be presented that might conflict with existing theory.
Yes, but we've been told that repeatedly by the same people who keep getting confused by the word "theory."