Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx
So, this makes her unsuitable to sit on the bench how exactly?

I realize that she doesn't have the same qualifications desired by the left, (eg: anti- Christ, anti life, pro- pervert, pro gay, anti- constitution etc) Is it because she is relatively independent, chose to dedicate herself to her career, and doesn't have a man in her life to be subordinate to that scares people?

I have for the most part, given up reading these numerous articles about Meirs, but every once in a while one like this comes along, which really has nothing to do with whether she is qualified for the job or not, and shows just how tabloid like the media has become, and deserves a stupid comment from me.

Why is it these same tabloids can't do the same for someoe like, say, John F'n Kerry, or Hillary 'thunder thiegh's' Clinton,or Barbra big mouth Boxer etc. digging into every minutr detail of their less than honerable lives? It's a sad statement of just how biased crappy tabloids like the LA times are, which really prints nothing newsworthy unless you consider what Holly-weirdo actors have to say, or who is winning the shortest and most numerous number of marriages race, the sleazyest dress, Most DUI's, or dumbest statment of the year Tony award, or what ever they are calling these events coke parties now.

10 posted on 10/09/2005 10:20:06 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Nathan Zachary

I think she's entirely qualified. I will watch the hearings with keen interest.


12 posted on 10/09/2005 10:23:02 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson