Replies

Whoops, I just noticed I got mixed up when posting my #57; this part was meant to be in response to your #55 (don't know how I managed to do that, I guess I was a little rushed this afternoon trying to catch up on posts after I went to bed and I got a brain cramp, LOL--sorry about that):

Regarding your other post, it sounds like Fitzgerald's interest in Miller may involve broader matters than his interest in Cooper did.

As I'm rereading here, I think I'm getting something completely different out of the quotation in question than emptywheels is getting out of it. I disagree with some of the sources they cite to support their "second forgery" theory, and I'm inclined to think Fitzgerald's interest in Miller's conversations about Iraqi efforts to obtain uranium involves something other than the hypothetical forgery being postulated. It may also be that Fitzgerald is wording things more generally with Miller not because he is seeking any specific item but because he wants to leave the parameters of the interrogation open in case her testimony raises areas of inquiry he'd like to pursue that are only indirectly related to the Plame leak. But of course that theory could be wrong as well. I have several theories as to what Fitzgerald might be after but I'm not really sold on any of them yet, though I'm tending to rule a few out based on what is known at this point--I think I have some idea what he's *not* after but what he's after remains an unknown to me, kind of like an X in an equation where you know some of the variables but you're still working out the answer, which is how I'm looking at it right now.