Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thumper1960
Frankly, the "priviledge" argument is pure garbage. The right to unencumbered travel, without fanatical control freaks interefering, is essential to personal liberty. I await the first attempt at taking control of all actions of the driver by a future system that will be sold as a safety feature to ensure that public roads are as secure as a mother's womb.

You can travel all you want unencumbered by the law, it's the vehicle you choose that matters. Are you arguing that you should be able to take a large private airplane up without having to prove your competency or having to obey the rules of flight once up there? If your choice of vehicle has the potential to be a severely lethal object then you have to agree to some regulation of your travel. Otherwise walk, ride a horse, or ride a bicycle.

127 posted on 10/09/2005 8:09:39 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls
Don't be rediculous. We're talking about autos, here.

Your argument is as hollow and vacuous as the "why do you need a gun? I suppose you think you have a right to a howitzer, or an A-bomb." crap that the infantile Left likes to spew.

129 posted on 10/09/2005 8:15:15 PM PDT by Thumper1960 ("It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed."-V.I.Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson