Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul Seeker

Again, you are recommending that we play it from a loser's standpoint; we can't do what we know is right - because of WOT or such-knot - I'm sorry, I could care less about what the losers will threaten - THE SUPREME COURT is paramount.


642 posted on 10/09/2005 7:17:54 PM PDT by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]


To: TheHound

Excuse me? Where have I portrayed it as something we CAN'T do Or SHOULDN'T Do?

I'm telling you what I think the analysis is behind the scenes, and I think it's a lot higher than possible defeat of a nominee. I also stated the administration needs to take that gamble and FIGHT BACK against the bullies in the Senate or ELSE in two years time they will find these same weasels renaging on funding for the war and demanding they all come home anyway.

How am I possibly advocating the defeatist attitude? I've done the opposite.


647 posted on 10/09/2005 7:22:46 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Barbour/Honore in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson