To: flashbunny
The head of the Republican party is bound to support incumbents, no matter what losers they are, unless they have done something obviously disloyal to Republicans.
Without this loyalty from the party head, you would have chaos in Congress.
146 posted on
10/09/2005 4:04:40 PM PDT by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
To: Miss Marple
The head of the Republican party is bound to support incumbents, no matter what losers they are, unless they have done something obviously disloyal to Republicans.
I think Specter's record is evidence enough of his disloyalty to the GOP.
153 posted on
10/09/2005 4:06:21 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
To: Miss Marple
You mean like that incumbent Senator in N.H., Bob Smith, when he was challenged in the primary by Sununu? Who did Bush endorse?
283 posted on
10/09/2005 4:37:42 PM PDT by
streetpreacher
(If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
To: Miss Marple
The head of the Republican party is bound to support incumbents, no matter what losers they are, unless they have done something obviously disloyal to Republicans. Do Dems do the same in primaries? I've never noticed myself.
352 posted on
10/09/2005 4:57:18 PM PDT by
maryz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson