Skip to comments.
Miers attends church services in Texas [Episcopal? I thought she was evangelical?]
AP ^
| October 9 2005
| AP
Posted on 10/09/2005 9:31:33 AM PDT by freedomdefender
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-227 next last
To: Maeve
Yes, almost there! My annulment finally came through week before last, then we went out of town. We have an appointment with Father on Tuesday evening after Mass to see what's next.
201
posted on
10/09/2005 3:40:11 PM PDT
by
nanetteclaret
(Our Lady's Hat Society)
To: nanetteclaret
How wonderful that you are almost completely across the Tiber now! God bless your wonderful priest.
202
posted on
10/09/2005 4:25:52 PM PDT
by
Maeve
(Remember Lepanto!)
To: nmh
Your bigotry is only surpassed by your inability to read (my post). You merrily skipped culling select quotes so you could slap yourself on the back over an issue you are obviously fairly ignorant about.
You sound like a "pie crust" Christian, to me: Easily made, easily broken; no filling inside.
I hope others notice your gay endorsement
So, start a vanity thread instead of a mere post.
203
posted on
10/09/2005 4:49:47 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: nmh
No. Did you forget you had written this:
If I understand this correctly... the Episcopal is now under the Catholic church.
The Episcopal church is not under the Catholic church. The spiritual head of the Anglican communion is the Archbishop of Canterbury, but he has no authority, except moral, over the Anglican bodies other than the Church of England.
Anglican communion differs greatly from the Catholic church on the issues of divorce, and there are also differences on the sacraments.
There is also a significant difference in how they treat the authority of tradition.
204
posted on
10/09/2005 4:52:34 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: copwife
President Bush has not let us down with any judicial picks up to this pointBINGO !
205
posted on
10/09/2005 5:43:05 PM PDT
by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(Houston - Showing New Orleans how it's done.)
To: Alia
Looks like Mary Poppins is your source of "wisdom".
"You sound like a "pie crust" Christian, to me: Easily made, easily broken; no filling inside."
And you didn't even get that right. I'll let you ponder what is wrong with it. Turn on those pixels in YOUR brain.
"Your bigotry is only surpassed by your inability to read (my post). You merrily skipped culling select quotes so you could slap yourself on the back over an issue you are obviously fairly ignorant about."
Yup ... how predictable. When someone doesn't agree with your pro homo agenda, you're a "bigot". YAAAAWWWWWNNNNN.
No "selective quoting" going on my me. You slipped up and you are EXTREMELY ignorant and easily charmed.
Also if I may add, NO DISCIPLINE. A few posts back you said you weren't going to respond to me any more. Here, let me show you how it's done. I won't respond to YOU anymore. I mean what I say. You're such a typical liberal. They talk out of both sides of their mouth and habitually lie about anything and everything and when cornered resort to mindless name calling.
You're such a predictable bore. Go bore someone else.
206
posted on
10/09/2005 5:50:34 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: PAR35
No. Did you forget you had written this:
If I understand this correctly... the Episcopal is now under the Catholic church.
The Episcopal church is not under the Catholic church. The spiritual head of the Anglican communion is the Archbishop of Canterbury, but he has no authority, except moral, over the Anglican bodies other than the Church of England.
Anglican communion differs greatly from the Catholic church on the issues of divorce, and there are also differences on the sacraments.
There is also a significant difference in how they treat the authority of tradition.
==========================================================
Okay looks like you clarified that too. The Catholic church though does see it differently. The phrase used was the Episcopal church is "now in the fold" - despite differences ... .
Since I am Bible based - I am neither an Episcopalian or a Catholic and I don't pay that close of attention to their scandals or what either is doing organizationally.
207
posted on
10/09/2005 5:54:54 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Then we would actually have a record to go on, instead of being forced to debate how many angels can fit onto the head of a pin.I don't believe anyone is "forcing" you to debate anything, much less persist in argumentative drivel. Please, feel free to go to some other thread, with or without permission.
To: nmh
If I understand this correctly... the Episcopal is now under the Catholic church. The difference being an Episcopal can marry whereas Catholic priests cannot. This is just about as wrong as it can be. The only grain of truth here is that because of the turmoil in the Episcopal Church USA (ECUSA) right now, some Episcopal priests of the "high" persuasion are leaving the ECUSA and becoming Catholic priests, and the Pope has given them a special dispensation to be ordained even if they are married men. Like permanent deacons in the Catholic church, a former ECUSA priest who becomes a Catholic priest cannot marry after he is ordained, and if his wife should die he may not remarry.
The ECUSA unfortunately is still running itself and doing a rotten job of it.
I don't want to spend hours explaining the odd dynamics of ECUSA, but the short version is that there is a wide range of churches under the name of ECUSA, ranging from very orthodox bible-believing evangelical and charismatic churches on one corner, very orthodox High Anglican (or crypto-Catholic) churches on another corner, the "muddled middle" mainline protestant on another corner, and the loony left anything goes ultra-liberal heretics in the last corner.
Unfortunately the loony left heretics are currently running the show, and they are running off the evangelicals and the High Anglicans in droves. They are even worrying the mainline types. The international church is in turmoil as well because the vast majority of believers in Africa and South America are demanding that the USA branch be disciplined and the mushy liberals in charge in Canterbury (England) are waffling . . . basically the ECUSA is falling apart and probably will not last much longer.
Which is why OUR family left shortly after the infamous 2003 General Convention and joined the Catholic church (an action known amongst Piskies as "swimming the Tiber.")
209
posted on
10/09/2005 6:04:49 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: nmh
The Catholic church though does see it differently. The phrase used was the Episcopal church is "now in the fold" - despite differences ... . Wrong again.
210
posted on
10/09/2005 6:05:00 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: sinkspur
Hey, sinky.
Where are folks hearing this stuff? I wish that ECUSA would join the Catholic church, then they'd have some adult leadership.
( . . . and with any luck, BXVI would beat the prelates at 815 like a rented mule.)
211
posted on
10/09/2005 6:10:32 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: AnAmericanMother
They're not "hearing" it. They're making it up.
212
posted on
10/09/2005 6:11:36 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: freedomdefender
IAC,the Episcopal bishop of the Dallas Diocese is very orthodox. A lead of the fight against the Robinson guy and, I think, evangelical.
213
posted on
10/09/2005 6:14:54 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Chickensoup
Unless they consider themselves anglo-catholic. :)
214
posted on
10/09/2005 6:14:59 PM PDT
by
kalee
To: Grampa Dave
LOL! Thanks for posting that. Priceless.
215
posted on
10/09/2005 6:17:10 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(The stars at night, are big and bright, deep in the heart of Texas!)
To: freedomdefender
Statement/Question: "Miers attends church services in Texas [Episcopal? I thought she was evangelical?]"
Response: Actually consistent with today's 'spirituality' she is in fact a Christo-Judeo-Zoroastro-Hindo-Confuso-Tao-Shinto-Wiccanist!
216
posted on
10/09/2005 6:17:24 PM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: sinkspur
But why?
What possible purpose does it serve to confuse the Piskies and the Catholics? Is somebody trying to attack Harriet Miers on the basis of being Catholic? Then why didn't they beat up on Roberts, who is unquestionably Catholic?
. . . color me a little bit confused.
217
posted on
10/09/2005 6:17:28 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: Crazieman
To: starfish923
are you kidding? What is the big deal here. So she goes to another church with her brother, some on here are acting like JUDGE and JURY. It is uncalled for.
219
posted on
10/09/2005 6:22:00 PM PDT
by
JFC
To: Columbine
220
posted on
10/09/2005 6:58:05 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(The stars at night, are big and bright, deep in the heart of Texas!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-227 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson