Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Sparky

"All we have is what little we know. What know isn't comforting. She's supports affirmative action and Title IX. She's organized conferences at SMU featuring radical feminists like Gloria Steinem.

Why in the world would she be a better pick than the many articulate conservative originalist judges that have openly spoken out and articulated the benefits of originalism and who have proven track records?"

Not to mention she was a democrat and contributed to the Gore campaign. Illegal immigration, out of control government spending, increasing social programs for those that don't deserve it, and now Miers. When will you blind Bush supporters wake up?


27 posted on 10/09/2005 9:54:29 AM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: doc
"Why in the world would she be a better pick than the many articulate conservative originalist judges that have openly spoken out and articulated the benefits of originalism and who have proven track records?"

That issue has been addressed repeatedly. She is a better pick because she lacks a paper trail. Without a paper trail, the left has nothing to use to attack the nominee.

This isn't rocket science. It is a political strategy that has worked before and is very effective.

32 posted on 10/09/2005 9:57:45 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson