To: ilovew
How can so many people who claimed to be opposed to having libs ask Roberts about his positions on issues now be in such hysteria because we don't know Miers' positions?Because she's supposed to be one of us? Because we were promised a Scalia or Thomas by Bush? Because we're just supposed to take on faith Bush's assurances that he knows her and we can trust her? That's not "hypocrisy"---that's prudence.
292 posted on
10/09/2005 12:11:10 PM PDT by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: Map Kernow
What makes you so convinced that she's not one of us if you don't know anything about her?
295 posted on
10/09/2005 12:13:59 PM PDT by
ilovew
(Never insult my role model. I LOVE KARL ROVE!)
To: Map Kernow
We trusted the Pundits in the past with Souter and O'Connor.
This is no different. Then the pundits had a trail they could used to snowjob the public.
it is a question of who would you rather trust:
Cowboys or Pundits.
Personally, I think the pundits have been going to too many DC Cocktail parties.
To: Map Kernow
"Because she's supposed to be one of us? Because we were promised a Scalia or Thomas by Bush? Because we're just supposed to take on faith Bush's assurances that he knows her and we can trust her? That's not "hypocrisy"---that's prudence."
Very well stated.
301 posted on
10/09/2005 12:16:49 PM PDT by
jdm
To: Map Kernow; jdm
329 posted on
10/09/2005 12:26:50 PM PDT by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson