[Howlin]

The very fact that he's remaining "neutral" on Miers is proof that he doesn't think she was the best pick.

Now you're just proving to everybody just how dumb and desperate you are.

He is remaing NEUTRAL because that is the way this is handled, unless, of course, you, in your endless pit of wisdom, can provide a link for ANY other Supreme Court justice coming out in SUPPORT of any nominee.

Got one? If not, stop saying stupid stuff like that.

[counterpunch]

> The very fact that he's remaining "neutral" on Miers is proof that he doesn't think she was the best pick.

Now you're just proving to everybody just how dumb and desperate you are.

He is remaing NEUTRAL because that is the way this is handled, unless, of course, you, in your endless pit of wisdom, can provide a link for ANY other Supreme Court justice coming out in SUPPORT of any nominee.

Got one? If not, stop saying stupid stuff like that.

Please don't misrepresent what I said. I was talking about Rush Limbaugh's "neutrality", not Antonin Scalia's.
For Rush to be sitting on the sidelines rather than leading the cheer speaks volumes of the incompetence of this pick, and I will repeat and stand by that assertion, no matter how much you take it out of context.

So while I try to refrain from the immature ad hominems that you seem throw around like a Tourette's child throwing a temper tantrum, I would have to say that you are the one who is "proving to everybody just how dumb and desperate you are."