They gain the right to be secure in their private property. I believe that few will choose to take a stand against firearms in the face of competition from corporations which are not allowed to infringe the right. You may not carry on my private property even if I choose to carry on business on that property.
There is no right to incorporate and be granted limited liability. That is a legal privilege granted by legislatures based on expected benefits to the whole people. One of the benefits can be the extension of the right to keep and bear arms to corporate parking lots.
the rights of private proprietorships to control their parking areas would be preserved,
What is being "preserved"?
What does a private proprietorship gain by acting against our Constitutional mandate that the RKBA's shall not be infringed?
They gain the right to be secure in their private property.
My gun locked in my car is not a security threat to their property. Can you agree?
I believe that few will choose to take a stand against firearms in the face of competition from corporations which are not allowed to infringe the right.
You may not carry on my private property even if I choose to carry on business on that property.
A gun locked in my car is not being "carried" on your property. Can you agree?
There is no right to incorporate and be granted limited liability. That is a legal privilege granted by legislatures based on expected benefits to the whole people. One of the benefits can be the extension of the right to keep and bear arms to corporate parking lots.
You are making part of my argument for me. Thanks. Are we in agreement then on the other parts above?