Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightDemocrat

I assume the term "guns-at-work" was selected by opponents of the bill? It certainly gives a different impression from "guns locked in your car."


2 posted on 10/09/2005 9:16:34 AM PDT by Tax-chick (When bad things happen, conservatives get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

Yeah, I assume that the person writing the headline at the Florida Times-Union doesn't like the idea. "Guns at work" is deceptive. It's more like the employee self defense act.


3 posted on 10/09/2005 9:24:16 AM PDT by RightDemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

"I assume the term "guns-at-work" was selected by opponents of the bill? It certainly gives a different impression from "guns locked in your car.""

I think your right. It is a very misleading based on the facts. I have no problem with an employer that sets a policy that something like guns, booze, or smoking isn't allowed at work. They own the facility and it is there right. But this is very different. To me a car is private property. Companies shouldn't have the right to regulate what you have on or in your property.


52 posted on 10/09/2005 1:56:51 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson