[dirtboy]

What does a private proprietorship gain [in a parking lot] by acting against our Constitutional mandate that the RKBA's shall not be infringed?

Once again, there is no point debating further as long as you show such disregard for the nature of the Constutution. It is a constraint against government, not individuals. I think liberal viewpoints are wrong. But they have the right to express them, and also exclude them from their property. It's that simple.

[dirtboy]

I'm defending our 2nd amendment right to have guns in our cars.

You have a right to do such in your car on public property. If you go on private property, you either need to conform to the wishes of that individual or leave.

It shows a profound lack of understanding of the nature of the Constitution, which is clearly set up to protect individual rights from infringements of any type from any source.

Show me ANY writing by the Founders that said the Bill of Rights was a constraint on individuals. ONE.

[faireturn]

Your claim that The Bill of Rights is not a prohibition on individual action is belied by the fact that we are all obligated to support & defend the law; - the law of the land as in Article VI.
All officials are sworn to defend it, as are all naturalized citizens. Those of us born here have that same obligation.

Once again, there is no point debating further as long as you show such disregard for the nature of the Constutution.

My regard for our constitution is shown in my argument, one you cannot refute.

It is a constraint against government, not individuals.

Repeating your unsupported opinion does not make it so.

I think liberal viewpoints are wrong.

So do I -- Many liberals think that the 2nd does not apply to individuals.

But they have the right to express them, and also exclude them from their property. It's that simple.

Yep, the liberals are using property rights as an excuse to ban guns. How sad that some conservatives can't understand that simple fact.