Bush the Conservative v. Bush the Pragmatist (Disappointing Behavior by Disappointed Conservatives)

The Washington Post ^ | October 9, 2005 | Michael A. Fletcher

[sinkspur]

Well, that may happen. If it does, God forbid, maybe the Republicans and rinos will see that they can't take everyone for granted...

You'll have to live under Hillary, too, goofball.

Most people who voted for Perot in 1992 regretted it greatly. We've got a replay in the works, it appears, as the more juvenile decide to pick up their marbles and vote for the Constipation Party.

You punish yourself if you do that.

[dk/coro]

Hey, DTOM888, what did you put in your water tonight?
Are you O.K. ? **S**

[HapaxLegamenon]

Of course John Kerry is a very conservative man and you should have voted for him, right? Just who would you have in the presidency if not Bush? He has done much good for us and he has made mistakes, in other words, he is human. Vote for 3rd party or stay at home next election at your peril, it won't be the republican party that suffers but the conservative constituency.

Whether or not there is another choice, does not change the fact that George Bush is not a conservative.

[Oklahoma]

Most of my day is spent in a car and I listen to talk radio, usually to Conservatives like Rush, Laura, and Sean. When I'm on-line I read the posts on websites I believe I can trust: NRO, WSJ Opinion, American Spectator, etc. Nothing disappoints me more than people I usually agree with being bigoted, close minded, illogical, mean spirited, and hysterical.

No politician is perfect. Bush certainly isn't and none of the other Presidents in my lifetime have been perfect, either. Not even Reagan. I find it amusing that some of the same people advising Reagan on his Supreme Court nominees, that gave us O'Connor and Kennedy, are now raising hell about Miers. We may regret her being placed on the Court, but it is also possible that she could end up being a better pick than some of the ones being pushed by the Bill Kristols of this world.