[Zeppo]

Amazing that Clinton would recruit another criminal to try and rebut the words of the former FBI director, huh...

[IGOTMINE]

Uh, did they give Bush a chance to refute the forgeries?

[SueRae]

Sandy Berger? Yah right, that's credibility.

[konaice]

Ok, well if Burger says it aint so, then we can all dismiss this book.

Er, Sandy, why are you wareing white paper socks with a black suit?

[scott7278]

Carson, who called the Freeh book ``a total work of fiction.''

I want to know what Carson said or did. Finish the sentence, Drudge!

[wagglebee]

Let me guess, all of the notes from Klintoon's meeting with the Saudi prince have disappeared from the National Archives.

[Wil H]

So if you take clinton's rebuttal at face value what he is saying is that he was totally ineffective at pursuing America's case with Abdullah and it was left to George Bush senior to get the job done.

Is that what he's trying to tell us?

[Zeppo]

the WASHINGTON POST reports

I have not been able to locate the story that Drudge is referencing on the washingtonpost.com website. The site is displaying "washingtonpost.com is undergoing maintenance and some sections of the site are temporarily unavailable" messages when I try to go to the Politics page or to perform a Search. Maybe it will be posted later this evening...

[Jeff Gordon]

Too bad this story is coming from CBS 60 minutes. If it was otherwise, there may have some hope that is a glimmer of truth in the story.

I don't care who 60 Minutes is wack'n, they is still ly'n.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

I bet Berger has the docs to prove it too. LOL!

[holden]

including those briefed about a private conversation between Clinton and Abdullah

The Kurintong Kabal wants hearsay evidence to override the FBI director's word.

HF

[demkicker]

This report from 60 Minutes PROVES that they may as well be taken as seriously as The Onion. For Clinton to bring Sandy Burgler forth to vouch for him and lend him any credibility is hysterical. Seriously, this needs to be on a Saturday Night Live skit!

[ConservativeGreek]

Mid week Rush predicted the absolute destruction of Louie by the Clintonistas.

[DogBarkTree]

Ole Loui sure stuck a pin in the party doll now. If his book is fiction then the Clintanistas can prove it wrong.

[nutmeg]

ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

[abletruth]

Sandy Berger should be in Leavenworth doing hard time for treason, yet he will try to make people believe that Louis Freeh is a kook...Clinton hired him and prasied him until he wouldn't be a Clinton lap dog. CBS the lying Al Jezzera network of America...Where is Mike Wallace with the forged docs?
able

[kcvl]

Right. We are going to believe the lying convicted felon, Sandy Berger.

"The president did not raise in any fashion the issue of his library.''


So, open the books to your LIEbrary Bubba and prove it! You lying scum.

[nutmeg]

ping

[SkyPilot]

In the statement, Samuel ``Sandy'' Berger, Clinton's national security adviser, challenges Freeh's assertion that Clinton failed to press Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to cooperate with an investigation of the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers

In other news, 60 minutes has agreed to allow convicted murderer Charles Manson to rebuke an editorial condeming BTK killer Dennis Rader.

"These charges against Dennis, are like, TOTAL $#%&* man! You hear me!! I'll get my family and come visit you in the middle of the F_&*$#@ night!!

[lilylangtree]

Sandy Berger, even though he got a slap on the wrist for destroying classified documents, is still a criminal. What I can't understand is why clintoon and his cronies get away with committing every crime conceivable, yes even murder, and never get any pen time. What is it that makes these terrible people so special?

[hummingbird]

``The fair journalistic question is why they didn't call and get comments for their story from people who were in the room, such as Sandy Berger, and why they took until Friday afternoon to get that done,'' said Lanny Davis...

Sandy Berger...Lanny Davis: that's rich. Who would believe either of them.

I am just as sure they'd be willing to give "comments" as I am sure they would lie without blinking an eye.