The assumption is that you support the 'tolerance' indoctrination of young children -being taught against the wishes of parents that homosexuality is normal and that sexuality should be explored at any age and or in any situation etcetera...
What is your position on this?
If on the other hand you are asserting that children being indoctrinated is wrong and that overcoming ignorance entails teaching children that homosexuality is disordered and the activity abnormal and dangerous then I would guess most would agree...
So what is the 'ignorance' you oppose - (1) PC tolerance of lies OR (2) the real truth based in moral absolute?
If your statement in post #78 was but metaphor mirroring your opposition to indoctrination then expound upon this -if you really assert the statement literally I and others no doubt would consider you over the edge...
What exactly do you mean with the statement "Personally, I don't give a damn about the children. To many people have been murdered 'for the children'"?
What is your position on this?
I think everything socialist, from sex-ed, to political correctness, to zero tolerence should be thrown out of schools and into the dustbin of history.
If on the other hand you are asserting that children being indoctrinated is wrong and that overcoming ignorance entails teaching children that homosexuality is disordered and the activity abnormal and dangerous then I would guess most would agree...
There is homosexuality and there is pedophilia, they are two different things.
I have no real opinion for or against adult-on-adult homosexuality. I am against adult-on-child pedophilia and I do believe parents should warned their children about it to protect them from such rapists.
So what is the 'ignorance' you oppose - (1) PC tolerance of lies OR (2) the real truth based in moral absolute?
I am against both (1) and (2) in the context that the belief of an 'moral absolute' is the dangerious, keep in mind that 'zero tolerence' uses the 'moral abosolute' mind set and we have seen how bad that has turned out.
If your statement in post #78 was but metaphor mirroring your opposition to indoctrination then expound upon this
What exactly do you mean with the statement "Personally, I don't give a damn about the children. To many people have been murdered 'for the children'"?
Alright I should have been a little more detailed in that post, I was talking from the mind set that liberals use the excuse of 'for the children' as an excuse to hurt people, and to will expound further, corrupt children.