Well, I didn't ask you, and there's a reason I asked him specifically, since he has a reputation for making things up.
You seem to have found one thing - the vote on the Fire Department resolution 16 years ago.
The inference you are trying make with the second item is not exactly truthful. There is no evidence presented in that article she had anything to do with the selection of the speakers after the lecture series was founded.
"Well, I didn't ask you, "
I dont care if you asked me, this is an open forum and I will address your challenges whether they're directed at me or not.
"You seem to have found one thing - the vote on the Fire Department resolution 16 years ago. "
Yeah, sure that means nothing right? Lets excuse affirmative action all in the name of "big tent conservatism" right?
Of course her contributions to Gore (who was NOT pro life as many claim here Gore cast multiple pro-abortion votes in the senate from 1985 to 1988.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1497421/posts?page=71#71)
and her contributions to the DNC days before the 88 election for Comrade Dukakis mean nothing right?
"There is no evidence presented in that article she had anything to do with the selection of the speakers after the lecture series was founded."
Quote: Ms. Miers pushed for the creation of an endowed lecture series in women's studies named for Louise B. Raggio
Ah but of course "women's studies" mean nothing right? Do you even know what courses in "women's studies" entail at the university level? Its radical feminism, my girlfriend in college took one of those courses and you wouldnt believe the marxist drivel they tried to force upon her. But of course...none of it matters right? BTW Louise B Raggio is a democrat