I'm reserving judgement until the hearings. At first I was not happy. Then, the more I heard about her, the more I liked her, but that was mainly w/regards to Roe. While I think she would vote to overturn Roe, much more likely to vote that way than Roberts, IMO, that's only one issue.
I still haven't heard about her judicial approach and her position on issues other than Roe. 'Till I hear that, jury is out.
Ditto!
Which is a VERY reasonable position that any THINKING person would adopt. But being in full scale freak mode sells columns and papers. Been kind of disillusioning learning just how much the supposed "thinking" Conservative punditry has sold out.
Roe v. Wade is a legal matter. It flows from Griswold and toward Planned Parenthood V. Casey. It represents federal judical power being asserted over the legislatures of the several states. Overturning Roe is as much a legal matter as it is a moral matter.
I still haven't heard about her judicial approach and her position on issues other than Roe. 'Till I hear that, jury is out.
On her, yes. On the wisdom of the pick, Bush is the only one in the line of fire.