Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmishDude
He did not defend Miers. He gave a broad defense of the notion that a non-jurist is competent to serve on the Supreme Court.

That being said, I have already stated-several times prior to and subsequent to the posting of that article-that Scalia would not agitate against this nominee.

In fact, I would lose respect for him if he chose to do so.

294 posted on 10/09/2005 9:38:50 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: Do not dub me shapka broham

It is just curious that he chose to express this particular view, that a justice ought to come from the non-judicial world as well as lamenting the process. Note that his is one of the main lines coming out of the White House also.


295 posted on 10/09/2005 9:42:05 AM PDT by AmishDude (Proud inventor of the term "Patsies". Please make out all royalty checks to "AmishDude".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson