[AmishDude]

I know Bork, for one, has no special information about her. I guess I'm not impressed by the SCOTUS like others are. I think they're all imbeciles, including Scalia. I think "great legal mind" is an oxymoron. I guess it's just me.

[Do not dub me shapka broham]

He had no special information-or insight-related to the Roberts confirmation, but that didn't prevent him from endorsing the choice, however ambivalently.

I agree with you, but take exception to the characterization of Scalia.

There are only a few justices during the 20th century, e.g. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Justice Harlan, Potter Stewart, William Rehnquist, who even approach the towering intellect and judicial foresight of Antonin Scalia.

I'm also pretty keen on Clarence Thomas, in case you haven't already noticed.

:O)