the question is whether she has the level of intelligence required to sit on SCOTUS.
When you're in a hole, stop digging.
"I meant what I said. Not credentials, you idiot, intelligence. Please read next time, I won't repeat myself"
Your quick resort to ad hominem says much. I used "credentials" to include amoung her other failings, her level of intelligence. Specifically, she is intelligent, but not intelligent enough to serve on SCOTUS.
I'll use more mono-syllables if that will help you understand: Miers. Smart. But. Not. Smart. Enough.
Better?
the question is whether she has the level of intelligence required to sit on SCOTUS.