Good point. She may well have been a connected rainmaker.
And having briefs submitted doesn't mean she wrote them.
And how much input do clerks often have in writing SCOTUS decisions?
You just can't even concede any points, can you? If she submits briefs that win state and US Supreme Court decisions, well, then, you move the bar and then say she might not have written them - even though the brief is her responsibility.
That isn't a debate. That's just being deceptive and dishonest.