Skip to comments.
Bush's Fault! Banished to backlisted cliches!
Posted on 10/08/2005 8:37:32 AM PDT by md2576
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-300 next last
To: athanellen
41
posted on
10/08/2005 9:00:28 AM PDT
by
gpapa
(Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
To: md2576
How could a Bush's fault thread NOT be Bush's fault?
42
posted on
10/08/2005 9:00:39 AM PDT
by
KingKongCobra
(Trying to save the "Donner Party" from themselves.)
To: md2576
The phrase is not as funny as it once was, but the phenomenon to which it refers has not gone away. "Blame Bush" is still a pervasive phenomenon that deserves to be outed and not just in this forum. Not only does "Blame Bush" stand in the stead of actual thinking on the part of leftward sheep, it stands in the stead of actual ideas on the part of the leftward leadership.
So it is not time yet to let go of the idea in my opinion. For example, I posted after Katrina, in an open forum dominated by Bush-haters, that they have reached the very heights of foolishness who blame the weather patterns on the American President. I think it just might resonate with some who got the weaker blend of Michael Moore Kool-Aid.
To: cloud8
And no more pix of HELEN THOMAS or BFT! "Hey, I resent that! Now come gimme a kiss, you."
44
posted on
10/08/2005 9:01:36 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
(Serving fresh wit everyday, for 36 years.)
To: SpeakLittle_ThinkMuch
We have take all your Bush's fault post.
45
posted on
10/08/2005 9:04:32 AM PDT
by
md2576
To: dmz
Can you get the phrase "stuck on stupid" relegated to the same place? and the ever popular: "noting to see here, move along"
To: NutCrackerBoy
I'm actually not certain who is a more pathetic human being:
1) Someone that thinks replying "Bush's Fault!" on FR for the billionth time is hilariously funny.
2) Someone that thinks replying "Bush's Fault!" on FR for the billionth time is a bold and noble statement against media bias.
To: csmusaret
You hit the nail on the head.
48
posted on
10/08/2005 9:06:52 AM PDT
by
md2576
To: md2576
I mean come on now. That's your best shot. I'm a troll? Face it you messed up with your post. I'm sure mummy will forgive you. Or are you Fabian from Filthy Rich Cattledrive? " This is boring, conversation over" Grow up and move out of the house.
49
posted on
10/08/2005 9:07:43 AM PDT
by
athanellen
(I won't tolerate rude behavior in a man.)
To: JRios1968
> Now come gimme a kiss, you.
ARRRGH!!!
50
posted on
10/08/2005 9:08:23 AM PDT
by
cloud8
To: md2576
RICH: HOW ARE YOU FREEPERS!!
RICH: ALL YOUR BLACKLISTED CLICHE ARE BELONG TO US.
RICH: HA HA HA HA....
51
posted on
10/08/2005 9:08:28 AM PDT
by
RichInOC
("The coffee is strong at Cafe du Monde, the doughnuts are too hot to touch..." Save the Big Greasy!)
To: manwiththehands
All cyber communities have their own 'in jokes'.
On the Fenderforum.com (GREAT place for musicians) it's "Maple vs. Rosewood; originally referring to a very personalized and often important choice in guitar fingerboards, now, years later, extended to choice of casket, crib or cricket bat.
On Slashdot.org it's not a real discussion until there has been at least one off-topic reference to Natalie Portman, hot grits or "It's all Microsoft's fault". The universality of 'in jokes' indicates their deeper function(s). Obviously I've had too much coffee this morning:-)
52
posted on
10/08/2005 9:08:30 AM PDT
by
RedStateRocker
(Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6)
To: Strategerist
It takes 37 muscles to frown. And 22 muscles to smile. And it only takes 5 muscles to use the friggin' PAGE DOWN key to go past the "BUSH'S FAULT" post. :)
To: md2576
Nice keywords Mods. Dang!
54
posted on
10/08/2005 9:08:45 AM PDT
by
md2576
To: All
55
posted on
10/08/2005 9:11:12 AM PDT
by
dighton
To: athanellen
Your analogy of who I am is as accurate as your assumption that you are in any way more intelligent, mature, or even the slightest bit wanted here.
56
posted on
10/08/2005 9:11:37 AM PDT
by
md2576
(You can't see the light DUnderground)
To: md2576
If you would let it, the cliche would just die on its own over time. You have no patience. Now you will get a flurry of bush fault posts just to spite you....and I will join them.
57
posted on
10/08/2005 9:12:46 AM PDT
by
fizziwig
To: csmusaret
Depends on what the definition of "is" is. It could be is what, is who, is that, is where, is when, is how, etc. To put it more simply would be "It is so." No?
58
posted on
10/08/2005 9:13:35 AM PDT
by
gpapa
(Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
To: md2576
59
posted on
10/08/2005 9:14:56 AM PDT
by
faq
To: fizziwig
60
posted on
10/08/2005 9:16:11 AM PDT
by
md2576
(You can't see the light DUnderground)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-300 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson