Skip to comments.
Nuclear power quietly confident in energy debate
Reuters on Yahoo ^
| 10/7/05
| Jeremy Lovell - Reuters
Posted on 10/07/2005 9:05:07 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Greenpeace told the European Parliament last week that far from being the answer, nuclear power should be phased out. Yes but tell that to the people shivering in their houses, or dying of heat stroke in the summer in their houses. Green peace will not be listened to this time. It is time to have another nuclear power era.
2
posted on
10/07/2005 9:11:11 PM PDT
by
KC_for_Freedom
(Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
To: KC_for_Freedom
It's good enough FoR China and FRance but not US.
Go figure.
3
posted on
10/07/2005 9:13:27 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: KC_for_Freedom
We need to get every Green peace member a giant mouse wheel set up with a generator and let them spin the energy crises solution to their hearts delete.
4
posted on
10/07/2005 9:26:16 PM PDT
by
seastay
To: NormsRevenge
I think nothing can stop this.
I wish I knew which company to invest in.
To: NormsRevenge
I think nothing can stop this.
I wish I knew which company to invest in.
To: NormsRevenge
If they'll pay the rent they are welcome to put a pebble-bed on my back 40. The GOP needs to gut it up and ram a massive expansion of nuclear power (tax incentives, environmental waivers, and tort limits) through congress. While they are writing the bill they should throw the same bones to oil refineries. It is time to stop talking about energy policies (done that for 30 years) and let the free market have it. The energy (electric and fuel) problems we have would be solved in a decade.
7
posted on
10/07/2005 9:29:35 PM PDT
by
azcap
To: NormsRevenge
First, we have to neuter the communistic eco-wacko movement, and establish a permanent home for nuclear waste.
8
posted on
10/07/2005 9:34:54 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: Siena Dreaming
Any power company with current operating reactors is a good bet.
9
posted on
10/07/2005 9:35:43 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: clee1
Do you have any examples?
To: NormsRevenge
The watermelons see economic growth as a setback to their beloved world socialism.
To: Siena Dreaming
To: clee1
"First, we have to neuter the communistic eco-wacko movement"
I say we take them in their sleep. They'll never know what hit them...
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9615545/
;)
To: Siena Dreaming
Sure.
Southern Company (GA Power, Entergy) - an excellent stock, which I own.
Consolidated Edison (NY)
Dominion Resources (Va)
Constellation Energy (Baltimore)
Duke Power and Progress Energy (the Carolinas)
There are dozens more. My personal favorite is Southern Company.
14
posted on
10/07/2005 9:43:49 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: CheyennePress
Nah... It's far more fun to pi$$ 'em off when they're awake! }:-)=
15
posted on
10/07/2005 9:45:03 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: Amish with an attitude
Thanks. I like Halliburton.
To: clee1
Thanks very much. Will look into these when I have time.
To: Siena Dreaming
18
posted on
10/07/2005 9:49:05 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: azcap
The GOP needs to gut it up and ram a massive expansion of nuclear power (tax incentives, environmental waivers, and tort limits) through congress. The "GOP" stands for "Gutless Old Pansies."
19
posted on
10/07/2005 10:00:13 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: clee1
May I suggest that we don't need to establish a permanent home for nuclear waste (I'm assuming you mean used fuel) now. A number of sites are storing used fuel in casks on concrete pads within plant security boundaries. Once the high specific activity fission product radioisotopes have decayed, the heat generation and radioactivity of the fuel rods are such that they can be air cooled and have reasonable shielding. This keeps the fuel assemblies protected, no transportation is required, and they can be saved for the best option, reprocessing.
If we reprocess our used fuel assemblies and create logical and obtainable breeder and fuel cycle pathways, nuclear fission plants can supply use with a very long, safe, and economical method of creating energy. The waste produced from used fuel recycling would be of significantly less volume and allow better utilization of Uranium, Plutonium, and maybe Thorium resources.
20
posted on
10/07/2005 10:10:59 PM PDT
by
103198
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson