[Do not dub me shapka broham]

But Ratzinger had a clearly delineated-almost overpowering-philosophy.

No one was questioning his credentials to be the vicar of Christ.

No one was scratching their heads, wondering what fundamental beliefs he valued above others, even if there were debates over what specific policies he might implement during his pontificate.

Harriet Miers is a blank slate.

A question mark.

This is not how you go about reshaping the Supreme Court.

[sinkspur]

Harriett Miers is not a question mark. She is a strict constructionist. Bush has said she is, and she will have a chance to prove it, during the hearings.

Do you oppose giving Miers a chance to have her hearings?