Considering the diversity of voices that raise this dissent, it would be very difficult for you to chalk it up to any simple personal foible. Compare that to the rather undiverse crowd that's supporting the nomination, which appears to consist mostly of people too afraid to face the possibility that their hero isn't what he's been portrayed as.
So if you're going to argue in favor of her nomination, be my guest, but you're not going to get very far if your chief strategy is to try to psychoanalyze your opponents.
We are not being psychoanalyzed. The diagnosis has been made and no consultation with the patient is found necessary. We're nuts.