No. You didn't. Because there is nothing inaccurate about my statement. I stated fact. And that fact is easily observable on forum page of this very site. The fact remains, a vast majority of Freepers either approve of Miers or are waiting for more information. It is also a fact that more approve of her than disapprove of her. That the most common answer is that people are waiting to learn more about her before forming an opinion indicates that at least 34% of Freepers have the intellectual integrity to admit they don't have enough information on the subject to make an opinion. That speaks well for this site.
Well when Roberts was nominated, I didn't need to wait for any more information. His record was clear, that he was totally qualified. Miers is doubt city, but of course, she deserves a fair hearing, and a chance to show she is up to the job.
Then the fact also remains that a vast majority of Freepers either disapproves of Miers or are waiting for more information.
Is this logic actually beyond your ability to comprehend, or are you being deliberately obtuse?