Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
As head of the Texas bar, she fought the ABA's pro-abortion stance, urging the ABA's policy-making committee to put the abortion issue to a vote. Which means Miers wants voters deciding the issue of abortion.

The only voters she wanted to vote were members of the ABA. The only thing she wanted them to vote on was whether to adopt a pro-abortion policy. It's a real stretch to morph that into an anti-Roe position.

Nice try, but you're still asking for an implicit faith and I can't do that. Besides, some things are still worth fighting for and even losing.

16 posted on 10/07/2005 3:02:54 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Don'tMessWithTexas
It's a real stretch to morph that into an anti-Roe position.

Do you have proof that any of the other nominees would actually overturn Roe?

20 posted on 10/07/2005 3:07:50 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (They misunderestimated Roberts; now they are misunderestimating Miers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
Besides, some things are still worth fighting for and even losing.

Hey, keep on railing away. It makes a great smoke screen.

The more conservatives yell, the more the general public believes that Miers is a reasonable choice, and the more there is pressure on the Democrats not to filibuster her.

If I didn't know better, I'd believe you're all secret agents of Karl Rove.

43 posted on 10/07/2005 7:49:08 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson