Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MurryMom
You have not answered my question about the SEC investigating this transaction. That leads me to believe they NEVER DID. The reason they never did an official inquiry is because the FACTS didn't warrant a full investigation. You have made a claim that the president is guilty of insider trading, a felony, and have nothing to back up this charge except insinuation. You claim the SEC sponsored inquiry was handled by a "Bush crony" but this person was appointed by the SEC. Show me the link between the SEC and the Bush family that would enable the Bush's to dictate to the SEC whom they should appoint to do the fact gathering.

What has the Congress got to do with this anyway? Without the findings of the SEC concluding their was in fact insider trading, there would be nothing to investigate.

Better go back under your rock or better yet have the mother ship beam you up and transport you to your rightful place with the rest of the DUmmies.
69 posted on 10/10/2005 8:37:24 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Eagles Talon IV
The reason they never did an official inquiry is because the FACTS didn't warrant a full investigation.

I gave you the FACTS earlier and you ignored them. The timeline demonstrates a prima facie case of insider trading. There should have been a trial so that GWB would have a chance to prove otherwise, but the SEC decided not to have one probably because the SCLM never aired the facts and others like yourself are deliberately ignorant of them.

70 posted on 10/10/2005 12:32:47 PM PDT by MurryMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson