To: DirtyHarryY2K; little jeremiah
To: lexfreedom
The Parkers thought it was their right, as parents, to decide when and how to introduce their son to the issue of homosexuality. It their right to introduce their child to SEXUALITY of any sort. I cannot believe we have these asinine discussions in this country, kids that young should not be sexualized.
3 posted on
10/07/2005 11:48:18 AM PDT by
msnimje
(If you suspect this post might need a sarcasm tag..... it does!)
To: lexfreedom
public education would grind to a halt if parents had the right to demand classes tailored to each child based on the parents moral views.
And this may be a good thing.
4 posted on
10/07/2005 11:50:26 AM PDT by
JamesP81
To: lexfreedom
Thanks for alerting me; I'll ping the list in a while. Have to back away from the keyboard, my "other" life is about to submerge me!
5 posted on
10/07/2005 11:52:53 AM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: lexfreedom
public education would grind to a halt if parents had the right to demand classes tailored to each child based on the parents moral views. It sounds about 180 degrees different than the argument they use when some parent wants to put a Bible in the classroom.
6 posted on
10/07/2005 11:55:49 AM PDT by
Tribune7
To: lexfreedom
I know it's probably not possible for one reason or another, but it would be nice if the Parkers could move out of MA.
There are still some areas in this country where sanity prevails.
To: lexfreedom
"The school argued that the law pertained to sex education, not discussion of family forms."
Since when is a homosexual couple considered a 'family'?
I believe that God instuted the 'family' with Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve. Divorce was the first distortion of the family. Now, homosexuals want to get their own twist in to the mix.
To: lexfreedom
David Parker is being disenfranchised! Where's Jesse Jackson?
It's ironic that this is happening in Lexington, MA, where the first shots of the Revolutionary War were fired. The Minute Men were resisting a much-less-intrusive tyranny of King George III.
To: lexfreedom; EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...
11 posted on
10/07/2005 2:29:38 PM PDT by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: lexfreedom
I'd think Parker has a cause of action of child sexual abuse against the schools. Sounds to me as if the administration is trolling for dates.
12 posted on
10/08/2005 6:56:29 AM PDT by
Mamzelle
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
13 posted on
11/19/2005 9:16:08 PM PST by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: lexfreedom; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; ...
14 posted on
11/19/2005 9:22:31 PM PST by
narses
(St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
To: lexfreedom
The American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts said the school is on sound legal ground (no surprise there), arguing that public education would grind to a halt if parents had the right to demand classes tailored to each child based on the parents moral views. I'm down for that.
15 posted on
11/21/2005 6:11:26 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: lexfreedom
And still, were it not for FreeRepublic, I would know nothing about this story.
16 posted on
11/21/2005 6:14:53 AM PST by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson