Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KMAJ2

Newt has completely changed his tune overnight without any reasoning or support other than "trust Bush". What did the white house offer you Newt?


3 posted on 10/07/2005 11:11:36 AM PDT by Betaille ("And if the stars burn out there's only fire to blame" -Duran Duran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Betaille

[[Newt has completely changed his tune overnight without any reasoning or support other than "trust Bush". What did the white house offer you Newt?]]

Thanks for proving me right about disparaging remarks from the entrenched. I think Newt listed quite a few reasons other than 'trust Bush'. Rather than be honest and acknowledge that fact, you choose to try to smear by innuendo. Such an intellectual tactic of reason, it reveals this type of tripe is not solely limited to DUers.


5 posted on 10/07/2005 11:18:32 AM PDT by KMAJ2 (Freedom not defended is freedom relinquished, liberty not fought for is liberty lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Betaille

Initially, I opposed the Miers nomination. Then, Dr. Dobson influenced me to support it. Now, I oppose it again after listening to many arguments from other conservatives. With this nomination, a division has occurred in the pro-life ranks. This is sad because any president who sincerely cared about the issue would not have allowed this. I am an evangelical, but I know evangelicals who are pro-life and support a right to choose. Miers may be like this. Of course, I think this would be a contradiction. Bottom line: I oppose the nomination and think pro-life senators should vote against it unless Miers speaks out against Roe at the hearings which is unlikely. Every attempt by conservatives to defeat this nomination should be made.


36 posted on 10/07/2005 12:27:58 PM PDT by toddp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Betaille

Initially, I opposed the Miers nomination. Then, Dr. Dobson influenced me to support it. Now, I oppose it again after listening to many arguments from other conservatives. With this nomination, a division has occurred in the pro-life ranks. This is sad because any president who sincerely cared about the issue would not have allowed this. I am an evangelical, but I know evangelicals who are pro-life and support a right to choose. Miers may be like this. Of course, I think this would be a contradiction. Bottom line: I oppose the nomination and think pro-life senators should vote against it unless Miers speaks out against Roe at the hearings which is unlikely. Every attempt by conservatives to defeat this nomination should be made.


37 posted on 10/07/2005 12:27:58 PM PDT by toddp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Betaille

Initially, I opposed the Miers nomination. Then, Dr. Dobson influenced me to support it. Now, I oppose it again after listening to many arguments from other conservatives. With this nomination, a division has occurred in the pro-life ranks. This is sad because any president who sincerely cared about the issue would not have allowed this. I am an evangelical, but I know evangelicals who are pro-life and support a right to choose. Miers may be like this. Of course, I think this would be a contradiction. Bottom line: I oppose the nomination and think pro-life senators should vote against it unless Miers speaks out against Roe at the hearings which is unlikely. Every attempt by conservatives to defeat this nomination should be made.


38 posted on 10/07/2005 12:28:07 PM PDT by toddp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Betaille

What did the white house offer you Newt?

An intern or aide?


44 posted on 10/07/2005 2:08:27 PM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson