He ran on this. When we voted for him, we all knew where he stood on these issues. IT WAS STILL BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAD.
He did? .. tsk tsk tsk
IT WAS STILL BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAD.
--
True, but when the Titanic started to take on water , it really didn't matter whose hands here at the helm.
As far as legiclation, they won;t do much of anything that will help to address the state's governmental spending issues and continuing addiction to spend spend spend..
They are patronage and a part of an overall push by closet GReens (no longer in the closet, mind you) in high political offices,, and who appointed them?
Liberals in Kalifornia should have been given a choice between continuing with Davis or adopting "Republican" policies.
I would challenge you to describe how things would be worse now if Davis had remained in office.
Would spending be higher? Higher than $115 billion?
Would more environmental laws be passed? Which ones?
Would more businesses be leaving Kalifornia? Which ones?
Would there be more tax revenue? By what means?
Would Kalifornia's long term debt be higher? By how much and through what means?