[I'm ALL Right!]

Like I said on the other thread...the MSM would rather spend hours focusing on a soda can full of spit in Penn Station than to cover this LEGITIMATE story, and the mounting evidence of an actual terrorist attack in the heart of our nation. (Real explosives, Islamic ties, and even a fatality here...but it's not newsworthy.) I'm ANGRY.

[mumps]

This is where I get confused. One person says that the MSM is suppressing the OU bomber story because it shows that Bush's WOT is justified, while another person complains that the MSM is spending hours instead on a possible security/terror problem in NYC subways and Penn Station. That's where I get confused: Doesn't that also justify Bush's WOT?