Have you read "Darwin's Black Box"? Or "Shattering the Myths of Darwinism"? (Which last, btw, was written by Richard Milton who holds no religious beliefs.) If not, read them and get back to the discussion. There is plenty of legitimate criticism of neo-Darwinism that does not use the word "God" or "Intelligent Design". But if someone believes in God, his questions, no matter how legitimate, are verboten.
Only faithful followers of High Priest Darwin and his holy apostlehood are allowed. It is censorship at its worst.
For a perspective on Richard Milton, it's informative and fun to visit his 'Alternative Science' site, where you can find out what he does believe in -- psychic spies, that the sun's core is frozen, that bacterial antibiotic resistance doesn't evolve, that sunspots and lottery numbers are correlated, and that 'Scans have found more than 100 people with "No detectable brain" in their heads'.
Of those 100, of course, 81 were FReeper creationists.