[camle]

and since neiother evolution nor creationism can be proven, to teach one over the other censors the untaught, and endorses the unproven, eh?

[staytrue]

The body of physical evidence is much stronger for evolution than for creationism (as currently esposed).

Frankly evolution does not deny creationism in general. It does contradict creationism as currently expoused like the earth is 10k years old.

[gondramB]

"and since neiother evolution nor creationism can be proven, to teach one over the other censors the untaught, and endorses the unproven, eh?"

No.

The basics of evolution -that more complex lifeforms developed from less complex life forms is a fact.

And even if scientific error is found, you don't replace science with religion, you replace it with better science.