Did you miss that part where such discussions can be covered "in religion, sociology, philosophy, political science or similar courses"?
How long have you been reading?
How long have you been reading?
I've been reading long enough to know that since that quote appeared in the article it would have been superfluous for me to repeat it. If you would rather me repeat exerpts from the article, word for word, before commenting on them, I could do that but I figured most FReepers could follow along.
That said, you comment about "where the intelligence came from" as a disqualifier for SCIENTIFIC (happy?) discussion in not valid, in my opinion. There are very similar questions that pop up on the evoloution side. That is the crux of my point.