Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sopater
Well, I have looked at the link many times, and unfortunately I don't have the time to go into the details of the problems with each of these speculative transitional forms. Pick a couple of your favorites if you like and I'll tell you why the assumptions are not scientific and why they are based on speculation and presupposition.

Archaeopteryx and Rodhocetus will do.

144 posted on 10/07/2005 11:57:05 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor; Sopater
Well, I have looked at the link many times, and unfortunately I don't have the time to go into the details of the problems with each of these speculative transitional forms. Pick a couple of your favorites if you like and I'll tell you why the assumptions are not scientific and why they are based on speculation and presupposition.

Archaeopteryx and Rodhocetus will do.

Chirp chirp chirp, sing the Cretaceous crickets.

211 posted on 10/07/2005 8:40:44 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: Right Wing Professor; Sopater
Well, I have looked at the link many times, and unfortunately I don't have the time to go into the details of the problems with each of these speculative transitional forms. Pick a couple of your favorites if you like and I'll tell you why the assumptions are not scientific and why they are based on speculation and presupposition.

Archaeopteryx and Rodhocetus will do.

Good thing I wasn't holding my breath.

Yet another creationist is shown to be unable to back up his assertions.

230 posted on 10/15/2005 9:47:12 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson