Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WKUHilltopper
How many decades did science embrace the Piltdown man and only to find out it was a hoax.

How many decades? No more than two. Some researchers recognized early on that Piltdown didn't fit. Friedrichs and Weidenreich had both, by about 1932, published their research suggesting the lower jaws and molars were that of an orang (E.A. Hooton, Up from the Ape, revised edition; The MacMillan Co., 1946). This is what a 1946 textbook shows, several years before the claims for Piltdown were completely falsified.

132 posted on 10/07/2005 11:15:56 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

Yeah, but the point is...it was 20 years--at least 20 years of touting it as factual. There was no caution, no "let's test this out" before we claim it's real. It was "let me jump on the bandwagon so my peers will know I'm in agreement with them and thus obtain social and political capital". It was all an ego race. Nothing ever changes, btw.


136 posted on 10/07/2005 11:21:32 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson