Let me explain why I won't be responding in detail. First, you are making a large number of claims that can actually be tested. Second, your claims contradict 200 years of accumulated knowledge. Third, if your claims had any merit they would be jumped on by people who have aspirations of scientific credibility, like Behe, Dembski, Denton and others in the ID movement.
If people who are trained in science and motivated to see evidence such as you present can't see it, then you are a disposable loony tune.
Down the chute with you.
Let me explain why I won't be responding in detail. First, you are making a large number of claims that can actually be tested. Second, your claims contradict 200 years of accumulated knowledge. Third, if your claims had any merit they would be jumped on by people who have aspirations of scientific credibility, like Behe, Dembski, Denton and others in the ID movement. If they had the scientific research that proved their position, they wouldn't have to come though the side door.
Some day we will have the few billion dollars to convincingly prove these things through scientific experimentation. Until then common sense is our only proof.