[js1138]

... finding that ID is a form of creationism and therefore constitutionally excluded from public schools.

The worst of all possible outcomes for them. They would have to go back into the creation science labs, sweep away all the cobwebs, raise the lightening rod, and do some science.

[metmom]

I guess then we'll have to throw out any scientific work done by non-atheists that lived before Darwin.

[Right Wing Professor]

The worst of all possible outcomes for them. They would have to go back into the creation science labs, sweep away all the cobwebs, raise the lightening rod, and do some science.

Or just find another euphemism for the same phoney nonsense.

"This is Originated Complexity. It's not creationism, and not intelligent design, oh no, this is new, and scientific"

[Doctor Stochastic]

They would have to go back into the creation science labs, sweep away all the cobwebs, raise the lightening rod, and do some science.

No, they would have to rely on the "argument from consequences." For example they could argue that Darwinism leads to people wearing stripes with plaid.

[wyattearp]

They would have to go back into the creation science labs, sweep away all the cobwebs, raise the lightening rod, and do some science.

Or...

they could just have a little meeting, come up with a new and snazzy name for creationism/intelligent design, and spend the next few years lying about how it isn't about creationism, intelligent design, or religion, and we can all go through this again, and again, and again...