Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/07/2005 7:09:45 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
THE SPEECH was even more important than the speech to the joint houses of Congress after 9/11.

Just my opinion.

2 posted on 10/07/2005 7:19:06 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
He could also have said "A prophet is not heard in his own country". There is no question that President Bush is a leader and wants what is best for this country. That he is continually second-guessed and vehemently and continually bashed by both the right and the left shows that he leads.

Clinton was popular, but was a flawed but accepted President because he tried to appease the left and the middle - he knew he could never charm the right.

Dubya is no Clinton. Praise the Lord.

3 posted on 10/07/2005 7:20:59 AM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The world has been quietly watching US President George Bush lately to see if he has lost his nerve.

I think we forget this, but despite all the carping, the world is watching. I am so grateful to have President Bush in the White House.

4 posted on 10/07/2005 7:21:27 AM PDT by Obadiah (Support Harriet Miers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Though Bush is rightly at pains not to declare Islam or Muslims as the enemy, he is also right to more bluntly state what is as blindingly obvious as it assiduously avoided: that the enemy is wholly concentrated in, and a subset of, the Muslim world.

HA! Even the author of this 'article' is afraid to do it

Islam is another death cult and as such is the enemy of 'life'

Proverbs 8:36 says that "all they that hate Me love death."

imo

5 posted on 10/07/2005 7:21:39 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The world has been quietly watching US President George Bush lately to see if he has lost his nerve. The continued deadly attacks in Iraq, a fumbled response to a natural disaster, and the failure to gain traction for his major domestic agenda item (reforming Social Security) have all given the impression of a presidency on the rocks.

Why is the MSM and even the conservative press so ready to accept these premises for beginning an argument. They could begin by stating: The continued response to terror in Irac, A major federal effort in the Gulf Coast hurricane relief and ongoing dialect in the domestic agenda ----. But I guess bashing Bush would be harder to do then. Do these people not understand that they are also tearing down our country and endangering their children's future when they support the terrorist.

6 posted on 10/07/2005 7:26:01 AM PDT by River_Wrangler (You can't be lost if you don't care where you're at !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

President Bush has shown that he can take everything the terrorists have to throw, everything France and germany (russia and china too) have to throw and even take everything that DEMs here at home have to throw. He stood tall for RE election and he has not waivered he has faltered and he has not failed. They see it, they just focus on something else (negativity) cuz they do not want to admit that he has not lost his resolve no matter what they say or do in opposition to him or his policies.


7 posted on 10/07/2005 7:26:36 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The world has been quietly watching US President George Bush lately to see if he has lost his nerve. The continued deadly attacks in Iraq, a fumbled response to a natural disaster, and the failure to gain traction for his major domestic agenda item (reforming Social Security) have all given the impression of a presidency on the rocks.

Why is the MSM and even the conservative press so ready to accept these premises for beginning an argument. They could begin by stating: The continued response to terror in Irac, A major federal effort in the Gulf Coast hurricane relief and ongoing dialect in the domestic agenda ----. But I guess bashing Bush would be harder to do then. Do these people not understand that they are also tearing down our country and endangering their children's future when they support the terrorist.

8 posted on 10/07/2005 7:27:13 AM PDT by River_Wrangler (You can't be lost if you don't care where you're at !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Friends and foes alike have been on the lookout for signs of recovery or its alternatives

And therein lies the problem.
If his "friends" were indeed his friends, it would only be us against them, not the President against everyone else, supposed friends waiting until the MSM indicates it's safe to be his friend again.

With ever-increasing attacks from the libs, it's times like these that W needs unwavering support. He's not going to withdraw his pick - that WOULD look weak. He's not going to back away from Iraq - THAT would look weak.

He needs trust - not self-serving "I'm not so sure this is best..." second guessing.
Friends don't stab friends in the back - and no, I don't think his pick was a stab in the collective conservative back, but their reaction to it sure has been.

11 posted on 10/07/2005 7:32:46 AM PDT by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"The world has been quietly watching US President George Bush lately to see if he has lost his nerve."

This statement angers me, as has even FNC's current rhetoric depicting President Bush as weak and faltering.

What I have been watching is something quite different. I have been watching to see how many Republicans and conservatives have begun to lose their nerve, something I'd never accuse the President of.

16 posted on 10/07/2005 7:47:11 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Whatever it's called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam," he said.

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, sure, sure!! We know!! Totally different! That's our story and we're sticking to it.

17 posted on 10/07/2005 7:49:34 AM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; still others, Islamo-fascism. Whatever it's called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam," he said.

I call this Political Correctness not to state the obvious truth that Islam is an evil murdering cult. I despair we will never declare total war on Islam and wipe the bastards out.

22 posted on 10/07/2005 9:31:30 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (BALLISTIC CATHARSIS: perforating uncooperative objects with chunks of lead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson