Replies

" I disagree with your assessment of what taxesforever is saying. I understood it, and maybe you did too, or maybe you did not."

We gave him plenty of rope to hang himself, and he did. We didn't have to drag any of this out of him. We didn't have to misquote him out of context like creationists have to do with evolutionists.

Do you agree with him too? We have yet to see a creationist (like you) say they disagree with his pro-slavery, anti rational-thought sentiments. Do you think that reason is a gift from God or the Devil? Do you think that what is morally right or wrong in one country isn't morally right or wrong in another just because the laws are different? Do you think that slavery is not a moral issue? Is that what you wish to defend.

" So I'll address this slavery issue. 1st of all its absurd, not recent, not practiced, has been decided, etc etc."

So why does taxesareforever think it is still OK?

" See why I would like to take your side more seriously but I cant?"

Because like taxesareforever you believe that rational thought is a trick from the Devil? :)

"So then your response is to insist I am a creationist (even though I said I am not)..."

You are one, why are you denying it? Are you embarrassed? If you say you are in ID'er it is a variation on the same theme.

"...and demand proof of the resurrection (which I never brought in you did). Whats up with that?"

That was what I was talking about to the other poster in that thread when you butted in and made a comment. Sorry if you didn't realize what was being discussed. And I am STILL waiting for ANY positive physical evidence of the resurrection. If you don't know of any just say so.

" Wolf (looking askance) And then you think you have won some sort of victory?"

We have Wolfie, we have. Your tacit approval of his posts is all we could have wished for. It's says so much about you.

We have Wolfie, we have. Your tacit approval of his posts is all we could have wished for. It's says so much about you.

When people feel comfortable rejecting modern biology because it runs counter to their literal belief in their holy book, then why should we be surprised that they find the laws and morals of that holy book likewise to their taste? The real surprise would be if a creationist could bring themselves to condemn slavery. One would have to ask how they could compartmentalise their beliefs so; using a holy book as a science and history text but not a morality and law text would be very strange behaviour. "Taxes" is the only creationist currently openly and honestly admitting to a consistent position on this issue. No other creationist will currently clearly state their views, because they know them to be unnacceptable in modern Western society. Several others have been brave enough to admit their pro-slavery views in the past however.

HHA HA HA.. LOL..!! HA HA HAH LMAO!! CarolinaGuitarman at his best.

taxes was misquoted all over the place. You have clipped text from at least 7 posters to him over the space of 500 posts. Plenty of people 'butted in' as you say.

You say many things, most of them about as absurd as these declarations and questions from you. You and your budds are are making a very poor showing for scientists in the case for evolution.

You want me to reject slavery? Well its your goofy and stupid game CarolinaGuitarman, LMAO LOL! But Wolf will play it with you as kitten momentarily distracted, then there is no more time for you about this.

Wolf now rejects slavery, and adds that to the list of rejected things as demanded by the goofball cultists of evo-cosmo cosmo-evo cult of the flying spaghetti monster.

This stands

Truth lives, lies evaporate & go away. Let go of your cult of cosmology & evolution, there is no truth there.

The cosmo evo cult lies to you with their conclusions, their inferences, their attacks.